Search for: "JOSEPH B. BARR"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Fine, Esq.Thomas B. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Fine, Esq.Thomas B. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Fine, Esq.Thomas B. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Fine, Esq.Thomas B. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 4:20 pm
[Barr will step down tomorrow. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Fine, Esq.Thomas B. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:12 am
According to the complaint, Workers' Compensation Judge Joseph B. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Biden, is the President of the United States and Merrick B. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Barr’s total compensation was $15,911,560. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 4:07 am
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring a conversation with Nate Persily, the James B. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
(Pike County)On October 25, 2010, the Honorable Joseph F. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:58 am
Example--what happened to Roseanne Barr; said it on social media and lost her show. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Averell Harriman Chair, Governance Studies Program, the Brookings Institution Joseph Margulies, Deputy Director, MacArthur Justice Center; Associate Clinical Professor, Northwestern University School of Law Alberto Mora, Former General Counsel, Department of the Navy Norman Ornstein, Resident Scholar, the American Enterprise Institute Thomas R. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 3:03 pm
The Justice Department refused to turn over Barr's memorandum: Initially, the Administration decided to withhold the document. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barr, 918 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2019) In Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
Policing debt collection to assure compliance with limitations bars. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:10 am
In his order without opinion, Luzerne County Common Pleas Court Judge Joseph Van Jura denied the defense motion to compel without prejudice, apparently leaving the door open for the issue to be revisited. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
D/B/A LAS COLINAS MEDICAL CENTER v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
